Letter to the Editor — August 16, 2017

Dear Editor,

I certainly can't refute columnist Charlie Mitchell's prediction that universal health care may be inevitable, ("Certainties include universal health care", Aug.11). Politicians on both sides of the aisle have shown a distinct fear of ever taking back an entitlement once awarded no matter how fiscally irresponsible.

I do part company with his comparison of health care to things such as roads, schools and such as a "shared service". Demands for these things are relatively inelastic. Demand for health care is not!

Demand for health care will go up exponentially as the price goes down to zero. Check out the waiting time for elective heart surgery in Canada if you don't believe me.

Noel Funchess

Cleveland, Mississippi 


THINKING ABOUT HEALTH: Health insurance in limbo

What should you expect now that the drive to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act appears dead – at least for the moment?  Given how legislation gets made in Washington, I wouldn’t be surprised to see some elements of the repeal and replace bill surface again, possibly tacked onto what’s known as must-have legislation. 

All that, though, is speculation at this point! What’s more important to millions of families who must buy health insurance for next year is how much will it cost and what will it cover?

It’s safe to say that Obamacare will be around for awhile meaning that people without employer coverage, Medicare, or Medicaid will have to buy their insurance through their state’s shopping exchange or choose a policy insurers may be selling in the individual market.

At the moment the state exchanges are fraught with uncertainty that will affect what your family will have to pay. Insurance companies are not sure whether the federal government will enforce Obamacare’s individual mandate.

Recall that the mandate requires nearly every American to carry insurance. It was a point of contention in last month’s Congressional failure to repeal the health law.

Without the mandate, there’s no way to compel people to buy health insurance, and that means fewer people in an insurer’s pool to share the risk of insuring the sick who will be among those signing up for coverage. If the mandate is not enforced in the coming year, some insurers say they must price their policies high enough to cover the claims of people who need medical care.

Their other big worry is that the Trump administration will not continue the cost-sharing subsidies for people with low incomes who buy on the exchanges. The Affordable Care Act assumed that people with low incomes – 250 percent of the federal poverty level or less – that’s about $30,000 for a single person and $61,000 for a family of four – would need help paying the deductibles and other out of pocket costs. So it provided for a system of subsidies for people whose incomes qualified them and who purchased a silver plan in their state exchange.

This year some 58 percent of Americans buying on the exchanges received subsidies, which reduced their deductibles and other out-of-pocket costs by between $700 and $3,400. If the administration takes that help away, it’s a good bet those people won’t be able to buy insurance. 

That’s exactly why the prospect of losing subsidies worries insurance companies as well as policy makers.  It means the risk pool will shrink even more. That, in turn, will cause premiums to rise, perhaps more than they otherwise would.

Because of all this uncertainty, insurers are taking no chances and are pricing their 2018 policies to account for the possibility of no enforcement of the mandate and loss of cost-sharing subsidies for individuals and families. 

In early August the Kaiser Family Foundation began to quantify what the uncertainty could mean for families buying in the state exchanges this fall.  In 15 of the 20 states Kaiser looked at, insurers have proposed double-digit increases. 

In Michigan, for example, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan requested an average rate increase of 26.9 percent while in New Mexico, New Mexico Health Connections asked for 32.8 percent.

While those proposed increases offer a flavor of what’s to come for policyholders in some states, it’s important to remember that few, if any, people pay average rates, and actual premiums for some people could be lower. Furthermore, insurance regulators often approve lower rates than the ones insurers ask for. Still, in some states, residents are likely to be paying more because of the uncertainty.

Keep in mind that paying a higher monthly premium isn’t the only way the uncertainty can hit your pocketbook. If an insurer chooses to charge lower premiums, most likely it will compensate by making you pay higher deductibles, coinsurance, and copays.  For 2018 the maximum pay out-of-pocket amount is $14,700 for families and $7,350 for individuals, which includes spending for deductibles, copays, and coinsurance, but not the premium.  

Paying those amounts is tough, so those buying on the state exchanges this year will have to carefully consider the trade-offs between paying higher premiums up front or more later if they get sick. It’s a choice that comes down to a family’s tolerance for risk.

What about the 156 million Americans with insurance from their employers? They’re not immune from higher cost-sharing either as their employers shift more of the burden of the growing cost of medical care to them. Using Kaiser data, Axios Vitals, a Washington health newsletter, estimated that deductibles for HMOs have increased 70 percent and for PPOs, preferred provider plans; they’ve gone up 41 percent from 2010 to 2016.

Just about everyone is feeling the pinch one way or another.

How will you cope with increased insurance costs this year? Write to Trudy Lieberman, Rural Health News Service, at trudy.lieberman @


A boss is many things

From time to time at the office, those of us that have been at The Bolivar Commercial for many, many years reminisce about the past. We have seen a lot of people go through this newspaper. Some have stayed a while and others hit the door pretty fast. 
I could give you lots of colorful stories about the characters I have encountered through the years but instead of reading a 
column; you would be reading a full-blown novel. Today I want to tell you about the very first person I met at the paper years ago. 
It began with me waiting patiently in the front lobby for my interview back in 1993. The butterflies in my stomach were working overtime and then I was told to go in to the publisher’s office. There stood a tall, lean man who was very professional and glaring at me. 
We went through the whole interview process and I was asked to take a typing test. Uh oh! My typing was horrible. It was never a good subject for me in school. No reflection on Mrs. Flowers, she tried her best. I did the typing test on the computer and just hoped for the best.
It took a week before I heard from Mr. Van Liew, but when I did he offered me the job and said we would just pretend that typing test never happened. He will be glad to know my typing has gotten better over the years.
Mr. Van Liew is a great man. He is tall and could be intimidating when he needed to be but he had other sides of his personality that made him so endearing. He could be a great friend and for me sometimes even a father figure. He treated us all the same. Fussed when we needed it and had fun with us when there was time for that too.
He was interesting to work with on an ad or graphic because he could tell you something in his way and expect you to do it that way. When he proofed it he would definitely give you an honest critique but the funny thing was sometimes his language of direction was confusing, he was trying to tell you something that you had just said another way. We called that Mr. Van language. 
He was the kind of boss that jumped in to help in any department at any time. He would come from a chamber meeting, tuck his tie inside his shirt and go in the pressroom to help print or catch off the press. I have seen him collate for our print shop, paste down pages, give instructions for news stories, answer the phone, roll papers and even deliver them. He could do all facets of The Bolivar Commercial and I admired that in him.
He had a great sense of humor and loved a good joke. He instigated many birthday gags for people and really got a good gag on me one time.  
The backstory was that I had invited the women in the office to come to my apartment to have a girls’ lasagna Christmas party. We were all excited about this and had been looking forward to it. There was a lot of chatter about it and I guess it must have sounded like fun. 
The day of the party, I had asked to leave a little early so I could get everything ready. Well, when it came time for me to leave, Sharon, my supervisor kept coming up with reasons why she couldn’t let me leave. It started to get irritating; little did I know there was a plan brewing. 
Finally, after much huffing and puffing she told me I could leave. So in my haste, I grabbed my purse and headed for the time clock. I clocked out and then heard a roar of laughter behind me. As I turned, I saw this tall ugly woman. But then with a little more focusing, I realized that it was Mr. Van Liew dressed in a skirt. He had rolled his pant legs up, put a skirt and added an atrocious woman’s wig. 
Once my brain processed what was going on I joined everyone in the laughter. Somebody even took his picture but it hasn’t surfaced in years and I wish I had a copy. What lengths he went to go to our little party. That was one of the funniest things I had ever seen. So the next day, I brought him our leftovers. He deserved that for being so creative.
He has long retired from here and has a wonderful life in Missouri but his spirit lives on in The Bolivar Commercial walls and especially with those of us who worked with him and loved him. So whether you knew him as Mr. Van Liew, Stormin’ Norman or Chief, he is someone who will always be close to our hearts.